What action should be taken when an error reports a non-unique associated object for a new object?

When an error indicates that there is a non-unique associated object for a new object, the best course of action is to identify the duplicates and change one of their names. This is essential because the system requires unique identifiers for every object to maintain data integrity and ensure that each object can be referenced distinctly.

If the same name is used for multiple objects, it can lead to confusion in data retrieval and manipulation, as the system needs a way to differentiate between them. By changing one of the names, you resolve the conflict, allowing for the proper creation of the new object without inadvertently affecting the existing data.

This approach not only resolves the immediate issue but also adheres to best practices in data management, ensuring that all objects can coexist without identity conflicts. The other options could lead to further complications in data integrity and do not address the root of the unique identification requirement.