Should coding reviewers be given permission to edit fields or edit layouts?

The decision to restrict coding reviewers from editing fields or layouts stems from the need to maintain a clear separation of roles and responsibilities within the system. Granting editing permissions to coding reviewers could lead to unintentional changes that might affect the integrity of the coding process and data presentation. By employing document edit permissions instead, organizations can ensure that only designated individuals, usually with comprehensive understanding and authority over data structure and layout, can make changes. This not only upholds the integrity of the configurations but also helps in maintaining a consistent workflow and quality assurance in the coding process.

The other choices imply varying degrees of flexibility in allowing coding reviewers to make changes. However, such flexibility risks the introduction of inconsistencies or errors if individuals who may not be fully versed in the implications of those changes are allowed access. When changes are strictly controlled, it fosters a more reliable environment for coding efforts.